|
U.S. Hunting Today
~~~~~
Home Page
U.S. Hunting Today Outpost
U.S. Hunting Today Broadcasts
Audio Pod Casts
Video V Casts
Idaho Hunting Forums
Hunting Articles
Product Reviews
Hunting News
Hunting Tips
Featured Businesses
Hunting Quizzes
Hunting Photos
Blogs:
Black Bear Blog
Daily Bag Limit
Blogging the Outdoors
About Idaho Hunting Today
Contact Information
Advertising Opportunities
Classified Ads
Hunting Land
For Sale
Site Map
Contributing Writers & Staff

Steven Remington
Chief Editor

Tom Remington
Managing Editor

Milt Inman
Chief Photographer

Steve Tweedie
Chief of Marketing, U.S. Hunting Today
Important Links
Idaho Fish and Game
U.S. Sportsman's Alliance
Pope and Young
Boone and Crockett
Topo Maps
NRA
|
|
Do As I Say And Not As I Do
By Thomas K. Remington
Tom Remington is an
outdoor writer and published author. He is
owner/administrator of
U.S. Hunting
Today and managing editor.
The
hypocrisy continues in Wyoming. Officials there continue
the practice of supplemental feeding of wild elk while
at the same time the government bans ranchers from
raising elk on farms saying it is unnatural to pen up
elk and it causes disease and threatens the wild elk.
Give me a break!
According to this morning's Casper Star-Tribune, a new
study shows, once again, that the rate of brucellosis
rose considerably in areas where there were feedlots.
A new report shows the level of brucellosis exposure
in Buffalo Valley elk has jumped during a period when
emergency feeding of the animals has taken place.
The new report
examining abortion and birth rates in the
brucellosis-endemic area of Wyoming said
seroprevalence rates jumped significantly for
elk in the Buffalo Valley. Seroprevalence shows
an animal has been exposed to the brucellosis
bacteria but does not necessarily have the
disease, which can cause ungulates to abort.
Officials are saying that the supplemental
feeding in Buffalo Valley was a temporary thing
and won't happen again, well, unless of course
the elk begin starving to death. But what about
other places like Jackson Hole? Are officials
going to keep feeding the elk there? |
|
|
There are two things wrong
here. The first is that if
the carrying capacity of the
land is such that it can't
support the number of elk in
existence then numbers
should be reduced. Hunting
proves to be the most humane
way of dealing with it.
Other methods are to
transfer elk to other parts
of the state or other states
in need of elk.
The second is the double
standard the state
exemplifies by "farming" elk
to maintain artificially
high numbers. It is my
understanding this is done
for three reasons - to keep
the animal rights groups
happy, to keep the tourists
happy and to keep the
hunters happy. Where's the
science?
Wyoming and Montana banned
elk farming because they
considered the practice a
threat to the future of the
wild elk in their states. If
this is true, then why is
the state practicing farming
themselves. Authorities say
that elk farming runs the
risk of the spread of
disease, brucellosis and
chronic wasting disease are
the two major ones. Time and
time again, studies show
that when elk are fed at
feedlots, the risk of
spreading the disease
increases significantly.
This is the same reason elk
farming was banned.
So why does Wyoming keep
feeding its elk and
prohibiting individuals to
farm elk? One can only
conclude that it must be the
government wanting a
monopoly on the elk business
while at the same time the
money is too good coming
from the tourists who want
to view wild elk and hunters
willing to pay to hunt the
animals. Certainly science
plays no role at all in this
equation.
I hunt. I promote hunting
and I think that the future
of hunting depends on good
sound wildlife management
that does not rely on
artificial means to sustain
it. This is nothing more
than put and take hunting.
It's time for Wyoming to
practice what it preaches
and finds better ways of
managing its elk herds. |
|
|